Another new video on YouTube (DrCraigVideos), this time explaining the moral argument for God (produced by Reasonable Faith – http://www.reasonablefaith.org). In my view, this is the best of the classical arguments for God’s existence.
“People can wax eloquent in a discussion on moral relativism, but they will complain when someone cuts in front of them in line. They’ll object to the unfair treatment they receive at work and denounce injustice in the legal system. They’ll criticize crooked politicians who betray the public trust; they will condemn intolerant fundamentalists who force their views on others. Yet these objections are all meaningless in the confused world of moral relativism.”
Here is an excellent new video explaining the kalam cosmological argument (produced by Reasonable Faith – http://www.reasonablefaith.org). Check out their site for Dr. Craig’s work on this powerful argument for the existence of God.
Here is an interesting five-part interview (on Issues, Etc.) with Dr. John Warwick Montgomery on Christian Apologetics. Topics include legal evidence, history and approaches to apologetics, and the influence of Christianity. Dr. Montgomery is a lawyer, professor, theologian, and author. He is quite witty and clever, and so his interviews are always very informative as well as entertaining. Check it out.
I may have posted this video before elsewhere, but I thought I would bring it back one more time here on the blog. It is a good illustration of the virtually axiomatic saying that “ideas have consequences.”
Warning: it is a bit intense.
“Any event which is claimed as a miracle is, in the last resort, an experience received from the senses; and the senses are not infallible. We can always say we have been the victims of an illusion; if we disbelieve in the supernatural this is what we always shall say. Hence, whether miracles have really ceased or not, they would certainly appear to cease in Western Europe as materialism became the popular creed.”
“In order to think we must claim for our own reasoning a validity which is not credible if our own thought is merely a function of our brain, and our brains a by-product of irrational physical processes.”
“No doubt most stories of miracles are unreliable; but then, as anyone can see by reading the papers, so are most stories of all events. Each story must be taken on its merits: what one must not do is to rule out the supernatural as the one impossible explanation.”
“Unless you start by begging the question, there is nothing intrinsically unlikely in the existence of angels or in the action ascribed to them.”
“If thought is the undesigned and irrelevant product of cerebral motions, what reason have we to trust it?”
“If things can improve, this means that there must be some absolute standard of good above and outside the cosmic process to which that process can approximate. There is no sense in talking of ‘becoming better’ if better means simply ‘what we are becoming’ — it is like congratulating yourself on reaching your destination and defining destination as ‘the place you have reached’.
“The difference between the Christian and the Dualist is that the Christian thinks one stage further…to somebody or something far further back, to the ultimate ground of reality itself.”